Filesharing Warning Letter – Ultimate Action Guide with all options
This is the most comprehensive and honest guide for anyone who has received a filesharing warning letter. It explains all 5 sensible courses of action—not just the ones that providers & lawyers make money from. This guide is based on years of experience and familiarity with all major internet forums (see sources).
👉 If you already know what a warning letter is, you can skip directly to the 5 options here.
1. Received a warning letter – now what?
Suddenly there’s a legal warning in your mailbox. The allegations sound threatening, and the deadline is tight. This guide helps you take the right next steps—quickly, free of charge, and without panic.
2. Quick basics: What is a warning letter?
A warning letter is a formal request to stop certain behavior—usually due to copyright infringement (e.g., via streaming or filesharing). It is not issued by a court or government, but by law firms on behalf of rights holders (this is important for later negotiations).
3. First aid: What to do / not do before choosing your option
- Stay calm – don’t panic
- Don’t sign anything, don’t pay
- Note the deadline
- Get a free initial assessment (e.g., from specialized platforms)
4. Differences: well-known warning letter law firms in Germany
If you’ve received a warning letter related to filesharing, it likely came from one of the following law firms (in 95% of cases). Each represents different clients and pursues different copyrighted works:
- Frommer Legal [More on Frommer Legal warning letters]
- IPPC Law [More on IPPC Law]
- RKA [More on RKA Rechtsanwälte]
5. All sensible action options: How should I respond?
Important: You have options and don’t need to act rashly. Review your choices and pick the one that fits your situation best. We try to list all possible routes and help you decide.
Option 1 – Pay immediately
By far the quickest route. Most people who pay immediately do so under artificial pressure from the law firm and looming deadlines—often driven by fear and uncertainty. But the demanded amount is usually negotiable, and the cease-and-desist declaration can be adjusted in favor of the recipient. A warning letter is not yet a court judgment—it’s an offer to settle.
Pro ✅ : Fastest way out.
Con ❌: But also one of the most expensive; you give in to pressure. The cease-and-desist is not modified and disadvantages the recipient.
Option 2 – Do nothing
Some decide to ignore the warning letter, believing that not every case will be pursued. In reality, law firms cannot take all cases to court. Some people have gotten away with it. However, this option is risky: If the law firm proceeds legally, you may face significantly higher costs and lose the opportunity to settle. It’s a bit like roulette—you don’t know your odds.
Pro ✅ : Potentially the cheapest option if you’re lucky and the law firm drops the case.
Con ❌: High risk of court proceedings, which can become the most expensive option. Settlements are no longer possible, and you’ll have to pay more or go to court (also costly).
Option 3 – Prove your innocence
If the warning was issued wrongly, you can dispute it—via automated tools (e.g., the free Abmahnbeantworter by Chaos Computer Club) or a lawyer. This is suitable when no copyright violation occurred. Bluffs are risky; proving innocence is complex, and German law initially holds the connection owner liable.
Pro ✅ : Potentially low-cost if innocent and using free tools.
Con ❌: Only advisable if truly innocent. Bluffs can backfire and lead to costly legal disputes.
Option 4 – Settle: Mediation with the law firm
Some services specialize in negotiating out-of-court settlements with warning-letter law firms. The idea is to avoid legal battles by reaching quick, favorable agreements (e.g., lower settlement amounts, modified declarations). Law firms are open to negotiating—this saves them time and effort. This option is ideal for those seeking a pragmatic, affordable, and quick resolution without legal risks.
Pro ✅ : Best option for those who can’t prove innocence but want to settle quickly and cheaply. No upfront costs, and providers are paid only if successful.
Con ❌: Not suitable if a case is already in court or a court order (Mahnbescheid) has been issued.
Disclaimer: This guide was created by abmahnungshilfe.de, a provider of such services, but without vested interest. The decision is yours.
Option 5 – Hire a traditional lawyer
A lawyer can give individual advice and file objections or create modified declarations. This is useful if legal action is already pending or the case is complex. Costs are usually paid upfront and vary (typically €190–€590). Some lawyers prefer court battles over settlements—which may not serve your best interests.
Pro ✅ : Legal representation from a professional who can go to court.
Con ❌ : Often requires advance payment. Fixed rates without guarantees. Not all lawyers aim for fast settlements.
Disclaimer: This guide was created by abmahnungshilfe.de, a provider of such services, but without vested interest. The decision is yours.
7. How do I choose the right solution?
Choosing between mediation, DIY, or a lawyer depends on many factors. Ask yourself:
- Is there evidence supporting or disproving the allegation?
- Am I willing to take a gamble?
- How much time do I want to spend on this?
- What resources do I have (time, nerves, money)?
- What’s my personal situation? (e.g., low income, students, unemployed people may have good reasons to settle.)
A good decision considers three perspectives: legal, financial, and emotional. If you have questions, we can review your personal situation and evaluate your warning letter to recommend a suitable option.
If you’ve had experiences with any of these options—or know others—feel free to share them in the comments.
Sources include:
- Settle in Berlin – Cease and Desist Warning
- Reddit Thread on Filesharing Warning Letters
- CCC Abmahnbeantworter Tool
- Finanztip – Warning Letters
No comment